Which practice best supports accountability and keeps progress on track in a leadership team?

• A. Publicly compare members' performance in a punitive way.
• B. Withhold progress updates to avoid accountability.
• C. Use regular check-ins to address gaps.
• D. Only review progress at project end.

Answer: (C)

Regular check-ins create a cadence for accountability and progress tracking. When leaders and team members meet consistently, gaps and blockers are surfaced early, allowing timely course corrections rather than waiting for a final review. This cadence keeps everyone aligned with milestones, clarifies who is responsible for what, and fosters a culture of ownership where reporting and accountability are part of daily work. It also provides timely data to adjust plans and resources, preventing surprises and keeping momentum toward goals. Public punitive comparisons undermine trust and motivation, withholding progress updates hides risks and reduces accountability, and reviewing only at the end eliminates feedback loops, making course corrections late and reactive.